RESUMO CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Um clima frio para a atenção primária na academia médica constitui uma barreira para escolher Medicina de Família (MF) como opção de carreira. Este estudo foi concebido para determinar se o conhecimento e as atitudes dos estudantes de medicina em relação à MF predizem a escolha da carreira. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo de coorte realizado em duas faculdades de medicina. MÉTODOS: Depois de terem completado um curso de Cuidados Primários na Faculdade de Medicina de Albacete, em 2005-2006, 81 alunos do segundo ano foram convidados a responder a um questionário. No seu sexto ano (2009-2010), 79 estudantes de Albacete assim como 42 de Sevilha, tomados como coorte não exposta, foram convidados a responder também. Todos eles foram investigados sobre a escolha da especialidade em 2011. RESULTADOS: Em Albacete, 79 e 76 estudantes responderam no segundo e sexto anos, respectivamente, e 26 em Sevilha. Depois de terem concluído o curso de cuidados primários, 69,3% disseram que gostariam de se tornar médicos de família. Esta percentagem diminuiu para 40,3% no final da graduação (P < 0,0001). No sexto ano, as atitudes com relação à MF pioraram, mas estas foram significativamente mais favoráveis do que as de Sevilla. Apenas 12 alunos escolheram a MF; eles obtiveram pontuação significativamente piores no exame do que seus pares (P < 0,0001). CONCLUSÃO: Na Faculdade de Medicina de Albacete, a opinião dos alunos sobre a MF ao longo da graduação piorou; contudo ainda era melhor que as dos estudantes de Sevilha. Em qualquer caso, MF foi opção minoritária.

ABSTRACT: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: A cold climate towards primary care (PC) within medical academia could form a barrier against choosing family medicine (FM) as a career option. This study was designed to determine whether medical students' knowledge of and attitudes towards FM predicted their career choice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cohort study conducted at two different medical schools. METHODS: After completing a PC course at the Albacete Medical School in 2005-2006, 81 second-year students were asked to give responses to a questionnaire. In their sixth year (2009-2010), 79 students in Albacete and 42 in Seville (taken as an unexposed cohort) were asked to give responses too. Their choice of specialty was investigated in 2011. RESULTS: In Albacete, the questionnaire was answered by 79 second-year and 76 sixth-year students; in Seville, it was answered by 26 sixth-year students. After completing the PC course, 69.3% said they would like to become a family doctor. This percentage decreased to 40.3% at the end of the undergraduate course (P < 0.0001). In the sixth year, the attitudes towards FM worsened, yet these were significantly more favorable than those in Seville. Only 12 students chose FM; they obtained significantly worse scores in their specialty selection examination than their peers (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In the Albacete Medical School, the students' opinion about FM worsened over the undergraduate course, although it was still better than the Seville students' stance. In any case, FM was seen to be a minority option.

Objectives. To determine the prevalence of gender violence in the general population in the primary care setting and its association with sociodemographic factors and other personal experience. Design. Cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study. Setting. Urban primary care centres. Participants. Patients aged 18 years or over who attended the Primary Care centre. Main measurements. An ad hoc designed questionnaire that included questions on experience of domestic violence and the short version of the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST), were used. Sociodemographic variables and knowledge and attitudes towards gender violence were also collected. Results. A total of 673 persons responded to the questionnaires. Of the 662 subjects who answered the question on whether they had suffered any type of abuse by their partner, 75 answered affirmatively (11.48%; 95% CI: 8.98-13.98%). This response was more probable in widowed or separated subjects (p<0.00001). Amongst young people there was a predominance of not having suffered abuse (p=0.01). There were no differences regarding the other sociodemographic variables. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age was the only variable that demonstrated an independent association with having suffered gender violence (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.005 - 1.036). A total of 560 responses were obtained in the WAST questionnaire and 12.0% were positive (95% CI; 9.2 - 14.7%). Its concordance with the question on history of domestic violence was very low (Kappa: 0.153; 95% CI: 0.038-0.243). In the case of previous abuse, in answer to the question "What did you do? the most frequent response was to get away from the aggressor. Up to 42.1% said they knew someone who was a victim of gender violence. Conclusions. In the primary care setting there is frequent contact with persons suffering gender violence. There are a considerable number of persons who admit to being abused.

Objetivo. Conocer la prevalencia de violencia de género padecida por la población consultante en Atención Primaria y su relación con factores sociodemográficos y otras experiencias personales. Diseño. Estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal. Emplazamiento. Centros de Salud urbanos. Participantes. Pacientes de 18 o más años que acuden a consulta de Atención Primaria. Mediciones principales. Se utilizó un cuestionario diseñado ad hoc, que incluía preguntas relativas a las experiencias vividas en relación con la violencia de género y en el ámbito doméstico, junto a la versión corta del Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST). También recogía edad, sexo, nivel de estudios y estado civil, así como conocimientos y actitudes con respecto a este tema. Resultados. Respondieron al cuestionario 673 personas. De las 662 personas que respondieron a la pregunta sobre si ha sufrido algún tipo de violencia en sus relaciones sentimentales, 76 dieron una respuesta afirmativa (11,48%; IC 95%: 8,98-13,98%). Esta respuesta era más probable encontrarla en viudos y separados (p<0,00001), mientras que entre los más jóvenes predominaba el no haber sufrido violencia (p=0,01), sin diferencias para otras variables sociodemográficas. Mediante regresión logística, la edad fue la única variable asociada independiente con haber sufrido violencia de género (OR: 1,02; IC95%: 1,005-1,036). Para el test WAST se obtuvieron 560 respuestas, de las que un 12,0 % (IC95%: 9,2-14,7%) fueron positivas. La concordancia entre la respuesta a la pregunta sobre si ha sufrido algún tipo de violencia en sus relaciones sentimentales y el resultado del WAST fue muy baja (Kappa: 0,153; IC 95%: 0,038-0,243). A la pregunta "¿qué ha hecho?" (en caso de violencia en alguna relación sentimental), la respuesta más frecuente es alejarse del agresor. Hasta un 42,1% de los participantes decía conocer a alguna persona que hubiera padecido violencia de género. Conclusiones. Existe un contacto frecuente de las personas que acuden a consulta de atención primaria con la violencia de género, siendo considerable el número de personas que afirman haber sufrido maltrato.

Flu is an acute infectious disease caused by the viruses A, B and C. It mainly affects the respiratory system and is easily transmitted by secretions and contaminated objects. It has a potential risk of complications, especially in susceptible groups, and is one of the most common causes of work absenteeism. With the aim of updating flu management and collecting information that will help the doctor in decision making, we reviewed the recommendations given in different clinical practice guidelines. We searched the bibliographical databases commonly used internationally and chose those guidelines that based their recommendations on levels of evidence and that had been updated in the last three years. We decided to include other guidelines that do not mention levels of evidence but that are endorsed by internationally renowned scientific societies or institutions. We compared the recommendations given according to five key elements: diagnosis, management in health centres, treatment, advice and information to the general public and vaccination.

La gripe es una enfermedad infecciosa aguda provocada por el virus de la influenza A, B y C, que afecta principalmente al aparato respiratorio, se transmite con gran facilidad por secreciones y objetos contaminados, presenta riesgo potencial de complicaciones, especialmente en grupos susceptibles, y es una de las causas más frecuentes de absentismo laboral. Con el objetivo de actualizar el abordaje del síndrome gripal y recopilar información que ayude al clínico en la toma de decisiones, revisamos las recomendaciones presentadas en diferentes guías de práctica clínica. Realizamos una búsqueda en las bases bibliográficas habitualmente utilizadas en el ámbito internacional seleccionando las que sustentan sus recomendaciones en niveles de evidencia y han sido actualizadas en los tres últimos años. Decidimos incluir otras guías que no mencionan niveles de evidencia pero están avaladas por sociedades científicas o instituciones de prestigio internacional. Comparamos las recomendaciones presentadas en cinco aspectos clave: diagnóstico, manejo en los centros sanitarios, tratamiento, consejos e información a la población y vacunación.